• Target location analysis (Fox, 5cm Rule, F3, Standard Literature)
• Topography (gyrus vs sulcus) and thickness at each site
• Local neighborhood analysis showing the high curvature variability
• TMS targeting recommendations specific to your anatomy

Key takeaway: Your 5cm Rule position (-38, 44, 26) has the best geometry—a peak gyral crown with your thickest local cortex (3.07mm). The Fox target is acceptable, but F3 and Standard Literature positions land in deep sulci and should be avoided.

====

You’re basically asking:

“How do we stop doing 1997-style blind hammering and use TMS like a precision, state-dependent drug with tunable waveform parameters?”

Good. Annoying, but good.

I’ll break it into the logic chain:

1. What closed-loop TMS gives you
2. What controllable-pulse TMS (cTMS / PWM TMS) can actually change