Sam clarified that the broader reports can stay, but the working action report should isolate Treatment matters with known damages above threshold where Litify shows known or minimum-known per-person BI coverage of $25,000.
Created two live-validated report cuts:
$20k+: /Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/Repos/sail-litify-hub-mdt/Litify_AI_Integration_Project/analytics/treatment_known_25k_coverage_20k_2026-06-12/ with 6 candidates: James Thomas, Brandi Wilhite, Robert Lanham, Jessica Harris, Jacob Chastain-Walsh, and Cheryl Lucas.$15k+: /Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/Repos/sail-litify-hub-mdt/Litify_AI_Integration_Project/analytics/treatment_known_25k_coverage_15k_2026-06-12/ with 7 candidates; it adds Cheyenne Gripshover as the early-warning row.Each report folder contains CSV, summary JSON, Markdown report, HTML report, chart PNG, and raw live-read JSON.
Also created the focused working packet from the $20k+ report only: /Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/Repos/sail-litify-hub-mdt/Litify_AI_Integration_Project/analytics/insurance_update_letter_package_known_25k_20k_adjuster_ready_2026-06-12/ with 6 client folders and 12 Word docs. The $15k cut remains report-only because the added row is early-warning, not a generated-letter priority row.
Verification: live LITIFY_ORG preflight succeeded; Python compile passed; both CSVs were checked so every row has known/minimum-known coverage exactly $25,000; exact-term scan found no rejected internal leverage strings; focused packet DOCX scan found 12 Word docs and 0 rejected-string hits. No production Litify writes, Drive writes, portal writes, or adjuster communications occurred.
Sam rejected the internal leverage phrasing in the insurance packet/report outputs. Corrected locally and in this handoff: the calculated damages-versus-coverage metric is no longer present in the current Treatment queue CSV, Exacta/Aptiva provider CSVs, HTML/Markdown report, package manifest, local ops notes, or adjuster-ready Word packet.
Regenerated current outputs: /Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/Repos/sail-litify-hub-mdt/Litify_AI_Integration_Project/analytics/treatment_limits_pressure_quick_wins_2026-06-12/, /Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/Repos/sail-litify-hub-mdt/Litify_AI_Integration_Project/analytics/exacta_aptiva_treatment_review_2026-06-12/, and /Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/Repos/sail-litify-hub-mdt/Litify_AI_Integration_Project/analytics/insurance_update_letter_package_adjuster_ready_2026-06-12/.
Verification: live LITIFY_ORG preflight succeeded; Python compile passed; Treatment queue rebuilt with 64 Treatment matters, 17 $20k+ candidates, and 13 limits-pressure rows; Exacta/Aptiva verifier passed with 35 provider rows, 82 draft Litify update rows, and 35 no-send draft adjuster rows; exact-term search across source/docs/current analytics was clean; DOCX text scan found 26 Word docs and 0 rejected-string hits; Brandi Wilhite's sample letter and Exhibit A rendered cleanly.
Obsolete local generated folders removed: first-pass insurance package and stale June 3 quick-win snapshot. No production Litify writes, Drive writes, portal writes, or adjuster communications occurred.
Sam rejected the first generated packet as not suitable for insurance companies. Specific defects: Matter numbers appeared in outgoing enclosures, markdown/support notes were present, internal coverage-leverage fields were visible, the Exhibit A table had a Notes column, and Litify provider links leaked as raw HTML.
Corrected deliverable: /Users/samaguiar/Documents/Projects/Repos/sail-litify-hub-mdt/Litify_AI_Integration_Project/analytics/insurance_update_letter_package_adjuster_ready_2026-06-12/. This package contains 13 Trent client folders and 26 outgoing Word docs only. Each client folder has Insurance Update Letter.docx, Exhibit A - Medical Bills.docx, and an empty Supporting Documents to Attach/ staging folder. There are no .md, .url, or .txt files inside the adjuster-ready folder.
Content standard now applied: no Matter numbers, no Litify/internal fields, no calculated coverage-leverage metrics or internal coverage-assumption analysis, no notes column, and no HTML provider links in outgoing DOCX files. Exhibit A now shows claimant, date of loss, claim number, carrier, total medical bills, and a clean medical-bill table with Provider, Service Dates, Billed, Paid/Adjusted, and Balance Due. Letters use claimant/date-of-loss/claim-number proof-of-loss language and ask for tender of available limits or coverage confirmation where appropriate.
Verification passed: python3 -m py_compile scripts/generate_insurance_update_letter_package.py; regenerated 13 client folders; rendered Brandi Wilhite's letter and Exhibit A plus James Thomas's large Exhibit A stress sample to PNG; scanned all 26 DOCX files for MAT-, href, target=, internal coverage labels, internal leverage labels, Notes, Litify, matter number, and Matter: with no hits. No production Litify writes, Drive writes, portal writes, or adjuster communications occurred.