<aside> ❓
The questions I asked of every app in the benchmark. Asking each app the same questions kept the comparison fair and made the gaps easy to see.
</aside>
Goal: find opportunities for AI-powered personalisation and adaptive experiences.
| # | Question | Good sign | Warning sign |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | How are features prioritised or surfaced? | Home leads with what matters now: upcoming payment, spending summary, cards | Cards, crypto, insurance, investments, loans and cashback all compete equally |
| 2 | How easy is it to find the relevant action on the home screen? | "Your subscription renews tomorrow" is visible straight away | Analytics → Payments → Recurring → Subscription |
| 3 | Does the experience adapt to behaviour? | A frequent traveller sees FX and travel spending | Everyone sees the same dashboard |
| 4 | What creates cognitive load or confusion? | Clear hierarchy and labels | Too many options, unclear labels, dense dashboard |
| 5 | Where is the opportunity to simplify? | Unused features recede, relevant actions come forward | A static interface for every user |
Goal: find opportunities for predictive subscription support.
| # | Question | Good sign | Warning sign |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | How are recurring payments detected and shown? | "Spotify detected as a monthly payment" | The user tags subscriptions manually |
| 2 | Is support proactive or reactive? | "Netflix renews in 3 days" | "You spent 15 AZN on Netflix" |
| 3 | Does it help decide, or only inform? | "Renews in 3 days and you haven't used it recently. Consider cancelling." | "Your subscription renews in 3 days." |
| 4 | How much manual effort does managing subscriptions take? | One-tap review and cancel | Search transactions, identify the subscription, manage it elsewhere |
| 5 | Where is the opportunity to intervene earlier? | Likely unwanted renewals are flagged before they happen | Tracking only, after the charge |
Goal: find opportunities for accurate categories, transparent insights and more trust.
| # | Question | Good sign | Warning sign |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | How accurate are the categories? | Uber → Transport | Uber → Shopping |
| 2 | How easy is it to review and correct a category? | One-tap correction, and the app remembers it | The same merchant is fixed by hand every month |
| 3 | How transparent is the logic? | "Categorised as Food based on your previous spending" | A category with no explanation |
| 4 | How do errors affect trust in insights? | Consistent categories, trusted breakdowns | Wrong category → inaccurate report → low trust in advice |
| 5 | Where is the opportunity to improve accuracy and trust? | The system learns from corrections | Static rules that never improve for the individual |
Goal: find where AI can be adaptive and trustworthy while reducing effort.
| # | Question | Good sign | Warning sign |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Does AI reduce effort and support decisions, or add more information? | "Renews soon and looks unused. Consider cancelling." | "Renews in 3 days." |
| 2 | Does AI learn from behaviour? | Category preferences are learned over time | The same recommendations for everyone |
| 3 | Does AI explain itself? | "Categorised as Transport based on your previous corrections." | The category changes with no explanation |