</think># Believer Baptism: A Graduate-Level Study Guide

From the Second London Confession (1689) Outward

Scope note. This guide is built as a research architecture, not a devotional. It moves confession → covenant theology → exegesis → history → contemporary scholarship → pastoral application. Bibliographic details (dates, publishers) should be verified against library catalogs before citation in formal work; I've flagged items where my confidence is lower.


How to Use This Guide

Track Time Use
Survey 4 weeks Modules 1, 3, 8
Standard 16 weeks All modules, one per week (Modules 3–4 get two weeks each)
Doctoral prep 6–12 months All modules + primary sources in Module 5 + the counter-position corpus in Module 7

For each module: (1) read the primary text first, (2) then secondary literature, (3) then write a 500-word précis stating the argument's strongest form, (4) then state the strongest objection you can construct.


MODULE 1 — The Confessional Foundation

1.1 The Text Itself

The 1689 Second London Baptist Confession (2LCF) treats baptism in three linked chapters, and this structure is itself an argument:

Chapter 29 clause-by-clause:

Content Doctrinal load
29.1 Baptism signifies fellowship with Christ in death and resurrection; being engrafted into him; remission of sins; and "giving up into God through Jesus Christ, to live and walk in newness of life" Signification is personal and applied, not merely covenantal-external. Four things signified — note that all four presuppose a subject in union with Christ
29.2 "Those who do actually profess repentance towards God, faith in, and obedience to our Lord Jesus Christ, are the only proper subjects of this ordinance" The credobaptist hinge. Note the word actually — it excludes representative or presumptive profession
29.3 Water; Trinitarian formula Ties validity to the dominical formula (Matt 28:19)
29.4 "Immersion, or dipping of the person in water, is necessary to the due administration of this ordinance" Mode. Note due administration, not simply validity — a deliberately calibrated phrase

Study exercise 1A: Write out 29.1's four significations and map each to a New Testament text (Rom 6:3–5; Gal 3:27 / Rom 6:5; Acts 2:38 / 22:16; Rom 6:4). Then ask: can any of these be predicated of an unregenerate infant without equivocation?

1.2 The Comparative Method (essential)