It is the baptism entry for Ludovicus Lagasse, and it provides direct primary-record evidence for the parents you have in your Filae tree.

I enlarged and read the entry carefully.

The 1705 baptism entry

The row reads, in substance:

25 May 1705

Ludovicus Lagasse, legitimate son of Petrus Lagasse and Joanna Bertran, of Altenstatt.

The right-hand column gives the godparents/sponsors, including Ludovicus … and Antonius …, also associated with Altenstatt.

The critical portion is:

Ludovicus Lagasse filius legitimus Petri Lagasse et Joannae Bertran ex Altenstatt.

In English:

Ludovicus Lagasse, legitimate son of Petrus Lagasse and Joanna Bertrand of Altenstadt.

This proves something important

We now have primary-record evidence that:

Pierre/Petrus Lagasse + Jeanne/Joanna Bertrand

↓

Ludovicus Lagasse

So the Filae information you supplied is not merely an online-tree assertion at this generation. The actual Alsace parish register confirms the parents.

But there is a date discrepancy