How to use this page

Suggestion Points to Use in Objections Below

Application: 73515 – Permission in Principle for up to 9 dwellings Land at Oak Avenue, Holcombe Brook / Ramsbottom

Object here: https://planning.bury.gov.uk/onlineapplications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=makeComment&keyVal=_ BURY_DCAPR_65008

How to use these templates

  1. Pick 2–4 strongest points that match your experience.
  2. Copy the text to adapt and add your personal sentence (e.g. “I walk my dog here most days” or “My children play here after school”).
  3. Keep the tone polite and focused on planning policy.
  4. Different household members should each submit their own comment.

Two short versions are provided at the start of this document for you to adapt - more detailed arguments and supportive points for use are below in individual template sections.

Further down under the Templates are the Developer’s key Statement points in summary, taken from their Planning Supporting Statement, we have proposed counter arguments to be adapted and reworded if you wish to use them.

Short Combined Versions

Example 1

I object to application 73515.

This field is fully and actively used by local residents for dog walking, children’s play, informal sport, leisure and community gatherings.

Residents have maintained it for years because it is needed as a recreational open space. It is designated under UDP RT2/1/3), was discounted in the 2025 SHLAA (HL/2784/00) as protected recreation land, and is protected by emerging Local Plan Policy LP-OS1.

NPPF paragraphs 103–104 only allow the loss of existing open space if it is proven surplus, replaced by equivalent provision, or the benefits clearly outweigh the loss.

None of these tests are met.

The adjacent field is waterlogged for most of the year and cannot serve as suitable alternative provision. The proposed “enhancements” are only illustrative and not secured at this stage nor do they provide alternative provision.

The housing shortfall does not override these clear policy protections. Permission in Principle should be refused.