【案例主題】

分批裝運下單據引用形式發票不一致、通知人地址與快遞收據要件

【案例概要】

ABC公司信用證允許分批裝運，貨描引用兩張形式發票。ABC分批出貨後交單，遭開證行提出三項不符：商業發票引用兩張形式發票但其他單據只引用一張；CMR通知人欄只寫申請人名稱未寫地址；DHL收據未載取件日期且無快遞公司簽名。爭點在於：分批裝運下，其他單據僅引用其中一張形式發票未必矛盾；通知人欄是否必須填地址須看信用證是否明確要求；快遞收據若作為寄送憑證，日期與簽署在本案被認為具有較高重要性。

【案情介紹】

信用證允許分批裝運。貨描：

1 000 meters fabric as per pro-forma invoices No.2008/1 dated 01.01.2008 and No.2008/2 dated 01.01.2008

所需單據包括：

Commercial invoice

International Consignment note CMR showing goods consigned to the applicant marked freight prepaid and notify applicant.

Beneficiary's certificate along with relevant original/copy/photocopy of courier receipt certifying that one set of non-negotiable documents have been sent to the applicant within three working days after shipment date.

ABC公司分批出貨並交單後，被開證行拒付，不符點：

Commercial invoice shows two pro-forma invoice numbers and dates whereas other documents show number and date of one pro-forma invoice only.

CMR shows only the name of the applicant in the notify party field and omits to show its address as mentioned in field 50 of MT700.

DHL receipt does not bear the date of pick-up and the initial/signature of the courier company.

問題：

1 除商業發票外其他單據只載一個形式發票號碼是否矛盾？

2 通知人欄僅有申請人名字未載地址是否不符？

3 快遞收據既無取件日期也無簽名是否不符？

【案情分析】