Hello James. It is the Ecuadorian guy you met in Mexico. I hope you read this, I had to comment:
Although we agree in the core, the ultimate power (could be) in the torches when they realize there is a vampire. There is one important nuance I believe.
Following the last names and killing the habitants of the highest room in the castle will not destroy the throne. However, that is only one of the objectives, achieving justice. Another objective would be to achieve truth, or to approach at least, to what really happened. If people would see the picture in HD, fewer of them would be black pilled. Flatearthers and other similar groups need the Jesuits in the throne, or their castle of cards collapses. Naive international relations teachers need the presidents in their throne, or their map disapears. Achieving the highest definition in the timelines will not only help us prepare ourselves for the aiki-do, but it would give us a glance of what is in “their” minds.
There is no mind of-the-individual, it is a reflection of reflections in the diffuse borders of traditions. To understand their mindset is to see through them. That is why it is unavoidable to underline their symbology; it is not Chineese, nor Shintoistic or Nordic, nor Indiginous American or Indian, the Saturn we find after looking is the “Shabat”. The serpent in the Vatican is the Gnostic one, not the Chineese dragon of rain (this, of course, is accompanied by a thorough investigation of last names and historical events; it is very valuable, as you point out in your video) And so, we understand what their modern luciferianism inherited.
But their theology is only one part of it. Another important one would be their political ideology. At this point something becomes crucial in my opinion: The Procolos of the Elders of Sion. My small channel got deleted this year because of my 2 part documentary series on the history of that text. It is the opposite of what Wikipedia says. Take a look at a sentence from Protocol 10:
“Then the institution of a republican era became possible; and then, in the place of the sovereign, we put a caricature of the same in the person of a president, whom we chose from the mob from among our creatures and our slaves. Thus we laid the mine which we have placed under the Gentiles, or rather under the Gentile nations. In the near future we will make the president a responsible person.”
It is clear they are bragging about their power to an outer circle. And it is also clear they planned to use presidents as scapegoats more than a hundred years ago. There is another relevant sentence I’d like to share, given the opportunity:
“The society known to us which would be capable of competing with us in these arts, might be that of the Jesuits. But we have managed to discredit these in the eyes of the stupid mob as being a palpable organization, whereas we ourselves have kept in the background, reserving our organization as a secret.
Moreover, what difference will it make to the world who is to become its master, whether the head of the Catholic Church, or a despot of the blood of Zion?
But to us, “The Chosen People”, that matter cannot be indifferent.”
“The Gentiles” and “The Chosen People” are artifacts for anthropologists and psychologists. I believe Power is behind them. In a geographical perspective, the people that live in the top will unconsiously find a mythology to be reflected upon. ¿Or the mythology will find them? One can say they used it to achieve cohesion in their inner circles. But that would be too human-centered. Our ideology is not at the top of the pyramid (unless we hold the torches): its their ideology that is.
Thanks for everything.
Alejandro Veintimilla