<aside> <img src="/icons/checklist_gray.svg" alt="/icons/checklist_gray.svg" width="40px" />
Sprint 2 Retrospective
Review of how the team worked in Sprint 2 and what to improve in the next sprint.
</aside>
| Went well | Did not go well | Improvement |
|---|---|---|
| Every merge ran lint, type checks and the full test suite (619 tests) before staging was released | Only 1 of 27 pull requests (#29) carries a recorded review | One teammate's review before every merge |
| Production went live and stays inside free plans | Most commits came from one member (109 of 138) | Share features across the team, one owner each |
| Every significant decision was written up as an ADR (ADR-016 to ADR-024) | Staging and production share one database | Give production its own database |
| The customer's design direction was adopted early and recorded (ADR-018) | A sign-in problem was found only in production (5 October) | Test sign-in end to end on staging before each release |
| Scope changes were confirmed with the customer before building | Nothing measures uptime | Add a free uptime monitor for both addresses |