https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/surprise-chaos-is-bad-for-business
https://www.economicforces.xyz/p/chaos-kills-coordination
https://www.apricitas.io/p/the-cost-of-tariff-chaos
https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2024/12/using-stock-returns-to-assess-the-aggregate-effect-of-the-u-s-china-trade-war/
https://www.nber.org/papers/w34036#fromrss
https://archive.ph/fnxER
https://archive.ph/YqV82
https://x.com/allie_canal/status/1910702205289582912
This is called "capital flight"
Studies
SF Fed Study Meme
https://rbaldwin.substack.com/p/did-trumpian-tariffs-kill-us-investment
https://www.labormarketmatters.com/p/your-2025-us-labor-market-wrapped
- The most rigorous recent macro evidence for the U.S. finds that tariff shocks depress trade, investment, and output persistently—and reduce employment—while trade-policy uncertainty is contractionary as well.
- Consistent with your “no‑hire, no‑fire” mechanism, state‑level evidence shows that greater exposure to trade policy uncertainty reduces hours and employment mainly via the extensive margin, because firms postpone hiring.
- And the last trade war’s micro evidence lines up: import protection did not deliver local job gains in newly protected sectors, while retaliatory tariffs produced clear employment losses—exactly the kind of environment that freezes vacancies and mobility without requiring a layoff wave.