案例01|Guiding Principles:Risk、Competition、Readiness、Budget、Skills 五個起點問題
案例02|Table 6.1 Decision Matrix:8 個 Criteria、100% Weight 與來源分數不一致
案例03|2×2 Prioritization:Quick Wins、As You Get to It、Major Projects、Skip It
案例04|Business、Finance、IT:三股力量如何一起建立 Business Case
案例05|Value Map:把 GenAI 專案連回 Revenue、Cost、Assets、Environmental KPI
案例06|Portfolio Design:2–3 個 Quick Wins+1–2 個 Major Projects
案例07|AI Tiger Team:Executive Sponsor+Business Domain+AI+Technology+Data+Legal
案例08|Map Business Processes:先畫 As-Is,再找 Streamline/Eliminate
案例09|Prepare the Workforce:Change Leader、Reskill/Upskill、Augmentation Strategy
案例10|Responsible AI Plan+Monitoring:Hallucination、Bias、Privacy、Business Impact
案例11|Choose the Platform:DIY、OOTB+Fine-tuning、Pre-built Application
案例12|Total Cost:Model Cost 之外還有 Cloud、Inference、Prompt Engineering、GenAIOps
案例13|Gather and Prepare Data:Few-shot、Fine-tuning、RAG 如何加入 Business Context
案例14|Hallucination+RAG:加入 Enterprise Data 仍不能完全消除錯誤
案例15|Compliance:Service Usage Guidelines 與 Corporate Guidelines 是兩套檢查
案例16|Practical Advice:Readiness、Prioritization、Cross-functional Learning 三步啟動法
| 核心主題 | 主要觀點/方法 | 實務用途 | 重要條件/限制/延伸 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business Case | 先建立 guiding principles、prioritization matrix、value map 與 cross-functional buy-in | 決定哪些 GenAI 專案值得啟動 | 不能先買工具再找用途 |
| Guiding Principles | Risk tolerance、competitive threats、technological prowess、budget、skills | 建立組織級導入邊界 | 高風險/依法限制流程可能根本不適合自動化 |
| Prioritization Matrix | Business value、ease/feasibility、demand/risk 或 weighted decision criteria | 排序 use cases | 避免 analysis paralysis,也避免盲目衝刺 |
| Value Map | 把 AI activity 連回 revenue、cost、inventory、uptime、delivery、environmental KPI | 建立真正 business value evidence | Productivity activity 不等於 business outcome |
| Portfolio Design | 2–3 Quick Wins+1–2 Major Projects | 同時建立學習速度與長期價值 | Public-service experiments 僅使用 nonsensitive、nonproprietary data |
| Tiger Team | Executive sponsor、business/domain、AI、technology、data、legal | Cross-functional delivery | 原書特別提醒 business/domain experts 常被漏掉 |
| Business Process Mapping | Map As-Is、找 bottlenecks、streamline/eliminate、再 redesign with AI | 流程重設 | 不要把 AI 硬塞進每一個流程步驟 |
| Workforce Preparation | Change leader、education、reskill/upskill、augmentation framing | 提高 adoption 與 trust | Training completion 不等於實際 adoption |
| Platform Strategy | DIY、OOTB+fine-tuning、pre-built application | 選擇 technology/model 路徑 | Cost、competitive advantage、skills、data、time-to-value 都要一起判斷 |
| Total Cost | 除 model/license 外還有 cloud、inference、prompt engineering、GenAIOps 等 | TCO/funding | 不能只用 API/license price 當總成本 |
| Data and Context | Few-shot prompting、fine-tuning、RAG | 加入 proprietary business context | 資料 quality、freshness、sensitivity 與 ownership 先於模型效果 |
| Responsible AI | Hallucination、bias、privacy、monitoring、post-processing、guardrails | 降低 deployment risk | 沒有任何方法能完全消除 hallucination |
| Compliance | Service usage guidelines+corporate guidelines | Use-case approval | Provider 允許不等於企業 policy 允許 |
第 6 章不是再介紹新的 GenAI model,而是回答一個更實務的問題:企業到底要怎麼開始? 原書把這個問題拆成三大 lenses:The Business Case、People and Processes、Technology Considerations。